One of the most obvious benefits of retaining and reusing building structures is to reduce the embodied carbon of developments – a very critical act in the fight against climate change.
Another significant benefit gained through a rigorous reuse approach can be to reduce costs and programme.
Working with experienced professionals who understand existing buildings and the capacity of the frame, without expensive and conservative strengthening work, can unlock many opportunities.
Mike, Alison and Gem recently co-wrote an article on the risk management of a heavy retrofit and vertical extension of a 1970s concrete-framed building in east London. Our article is featured in the latest issue of The Structural Engineer journal.
When assessing whether it is commercially viable to retain and extend an existing building, an oversimplistic or conservative approach will not only limit new innovations in construction but will be detrimental to the planet.
We know that good communication and systematic risk management are key components to fully understanding the commercial viability of a project, and we share our findings and expertise in this article.
We also feature a case study of the Mary Ward Centre in London (page 32), a project that highlights the potential to reuse existing buildings if a suitable approach is taken.
This stunning transformation of a 1970s concrete-framed building won a Structural Award for its Planet and Process attributes, with the judges commending the structural engineers for their diligent approach to establishing how the structure could be strengthened and extended rather than demolished.
Editor’s Comment
Robin Jones, Managing Editor